There are a million different ways to define happiness. Show
Especially in the field of psychology, where operational definitions are a constant work in progress. Eudaimonia is not only one of the oldest, but it has stood the test of time for another reason. That reason being, eudaimonia has the whole element of subjectivity built into it. It’s simultaneously both less and more prescriptive and dives quite deeply into the ideas of virtues and virtue ethics. In this article, we’ll look at Aristotle’s definition of Eudaimonia and its significant influence on the way ‘happiness’ and ‘wellbeing’ are viewed in positive psychology. Most significantly, through its implications for subjective wellbeing. Before you continue, we thought you might like to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free. These science-based exercises will explore fundamental aspects of positive psychology including strengths, values, and self-compassion, and will give you the tools to enhance the wellbeing of your clients, students, or employees. This Article Contains:
What is Eudaimonia? (Incl. Definition)In its simplest (translated) form, eudaimonia is often taken to mean happiness (Deci & Ryan, 2006; Huta & Waterman, 2014; Heintzelman, 2018). Sometimes it is translated from the original ancient Greek as welfare, sometimes flourishing, and sometimes as wellbeing (Kraut, 2018). The concept of Eudaimonia comes from Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, his philosophical work on the ‘science of happiness’ (Irwin, 2012). We’ll look at this idea of ‘the science of happiness’ a little more closely later in this article. Eudaimonia is about individual happiness; according to Deci and Ryan (2006: 2), it maintains that:
As there are so many different ways to translate the term into English, it may even be helpful to look at the etymology. If it helps to provide more context, eudaimonia is a combination of the prefix eu (which means good, or well), and daimon (which means spirit) (Gåvertsson, n.d.). The latter also appears in various related forms in contemporary literature, such as the idea of a dæmon as one’s soul in Philip Pullman’s bestselling Northern Lights (Oxford Dictionaries, 2019). A Brief History of EudaimoniaAs noted, the concept of Eudaimonia can be traced back to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Prior to this, however, Athenian philosophers such as Socrates and Plato (Aristotle’s mentor) were already entertaining similar concepts. Socrates on EudaimoniaSocrates, like Plato, believed that virtue (or arête, the very idea of virtue) was a form of knowledge—specifically, a knowledge of good and evil (Bobonich, 2010). That is, he saw numerous virtues—justice, piety, courage as united. That is, all were one, and they were all knowledge. Socrates viewed this knowledge as required for us as humans to achieve the ‘ultimate good’, which was eudaimonia. And by ‘us’, Socrates meant the individual (Waterman, 1993; Deci & Ryan, 2006). Plato and EudaimonismIn a somewhat similar vein, Plato believed that individuals naturally feel unhappiness when they do something they know and acknowledge to be wrong (Price, 2011). Eudaimonia, according to Plato, was the highest and ultimate aim of both moral thought and behavior. Nonetheless, while Plato was believed somewhat to have refined the concept, he offered no direct definition for it. As with Socrates, he saw virtue as integral to eudaimonia. One thing is worth noting at this point. If this idea of an ‘ultimate goal’ for individuals is beginning to sound familiar, rest assured that there is good reason for thinking so. The similarities between eudaimonia and concepts such as Maslow’s self-actualization (1968) are indeed widely accepted in the psychological literature (Heintzelman, 2018). Given that we know Plato mentored Aristotle, let’s look at what the latter believed. Aristotlean EudaimoniaNumerous interpretations have been offered for Aristotle’s eudaimonia, with a general consensus on the idea that eudaimonia reflects “pursuit of virtue, excellence, and the best within us” (Huta & Waterman, 2014: 1426). That is, he believed eudaimonia was rational activity aimed at pursuing ‘what is worthwhile in life’. Where Aristotle diverged from Plato and some other thinkers is in his belief about what is ‘enough’ (roughly) for eudaimonia. For the latter, virtue was enough for the ultimate good that is eudaimonia. For Aristotle, virtue was required, but not sufficient (Annas, 1993). In layperson’s terms, we can’t just act with virtuous, but we have also to intend to be virtuous, too. I will return to this a little later when looking at Aristotle’s ethics. But for now, he believes that happiness and wellbeing come from how we live our lives. And that’s not in pursuit of material wealth, power, or honor. Rather, eudaimonic happiness is about lives lived and actions taken in pursuit of eudaimonia. Also at this point, you probably understand why some translations are argued to fall a little flat when it comes to describing Aristotle’s philosophical concept. Where rational activity is required to pursue an ultimate goal, beings such as plants—which do ‘flourish’—don’t qualify. Where these rational activities include “pride, wittiness, friendships that are mutually beneficial, pride and honesty among others”, neither do lots of other creatures (Hursthouse, 1999). A Look at Aristotle’s Concept of Happiness and Well-BeingIf you could ask Aristotle himself what happiness is, this is exactly what he’d say:
Aristotle, Nichomacean Ethics, Book I, Chapter 8 (excerpt from Nothingistic.org, 2019) Happily, we also have more concise and straightforward excerpts that reveal how we go about it. Happy Life According to AristotleTo be honest, a lot of Nichomacean Ethics is about what happiness isn’t. ‘Satisfying appetites’, Ryan and Singer argue is akin to “life suitable to beasts”, according to the philosopher (2006: 16). The pursuit of political power, material wealth, even fun and leisure, he saw as “laughable things”, inferior to “serious things” (Ryff & Singer, 2008: 16). Instead, happiness is an ‘intermediate’, or a ‘golden mean’ between deficiency and excess (Ryff & Singer, 2008). One example of virtue as a mean between two extremes is courage – as a virtue, it’s halfway between recklessness and cowardice (Kings College London, 2012). Here, we see the ‘rational activity’ aspect of eudaimonia coming back to the fore. When we are faced with situations, therefore, it can be argued that Aristotle isn’t giving prescriptive advice. He is, however, telling us how he believes the rational, virtuous pursuit of eudaimonia might look in an everyday setting. Role of ExternalitiesSo, what if you’re very, very unlucky? If you’ve read Nichomacean Ethics (maybe only skimmed partway through), this question is not an unreasonable one. After all, Aristotle argued: “He is happy who lives in accordance with complete virtue and is sufficiently equipped with external goods, not for some chance period but throughout a complete life.” – Aristotle, Nichomacean Ethics, Book I, Chapter 10 (excerpt from Nothingistic.org, 2019). Basically, yes, Aristotle acknowledged that fate or luck can play a role in our happiness. Nonetheless, he also believed that this task of ‘individual self-realization’ is how we go about it with our ‘own disposition and talent’ (Ryff & Singer, 2008: 17). This excerpt also suggests that we should be aiming for ‘all of the virtues’, so it’s worthwhile considering Aristotle’s stance on being virtuous. The Philosophy Behind Aristotle’s EthicsAs we can now see, Aristotle’s eudaimonia is a moral happiness concept. It is very much about living a life in accordance with virtues (Hursthouse, 1999). But what are these virtues, then? Of course, there is a large subjective element to what ‘virtue’ is. What one person holds to be virtuous isn’t always going to ring with that of others. Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Professor Peter Adamson gives some brilliant examples in this Kings College London video: One of these is ‘piety’, which was mentioned in the earlier look at Socrates. For example, can you be too pious? Some would argue yes, others, no. From what we’ve already discussed, however, we know Aristotle believes happiness is not about pursuing eudaimonia through various means in order to be happy. This is, he argues, is founded in instrumentality. Happiness, he might be seen as arguing, is once again the rational activity in pursuit of virtue itself. These virtues won’t necessarily be cut in stone. But, if we ask ourselves what we believe is good, or how we should live our lives, virtue ethics would argue that we have at least some starting points (Hursthouse, 1999). Modern Psychology and EudaimoniaSo far, we’ve looked a little bit at subjectivity, flourishing, happiness, wellbeing, and actualization. All in a philosophical context. Hopefully, it provided some context. Because, naturally, eudaimonia thus has myriad implications for psychologists with an interest in subjective wellbeing (SWB), and psychological wellbeing (PWB). And positive psychology is all about human flourishing and happiness. Overview of Psychological Research on EudaimoniaAs a very concise overview of how the concept appears within psychology, here are some aspects that have been studied:
Of course, this is far from an exhaustive list, and as interdisciplinary interest grows, we can expect the same from the broader body of research. Plato on EudaimoniaAs mentioned above, Plato never distinctly referred to eudaimonia by that term. A lot of what we know about his stance on the same comes from Republic (Amazon), his work on justice. In it, he writes of three friends who talk about what a ‘just’ republic would look like, and he premised four virtues (Bhandari, 1999; VanderWeele, 2017):
He believed that happiness was about living in pursuit of these virtues, and thus virtue is central to flourishing. Socrates and EudaimoniaSocrates, as discussed, saw eudaimonia as an ‘ultimate’ goal. Like Aristotle after him, Socrates emphasized the role and importance of arête very heavily—in fact, he believed it was both a means and an end to human happiness. In pursuit of what we now commonly refer to as ‘flourishing’, he encouraged people to ask themselves, and others, what was ‘good’ for our souls (Cooper, 1996). He believed, it is argued, that eudaimonia was ‘justly living well’, and that in doing so, we seek not experiential pleasure or ‘honor’ in isolation, but a good and happy life, guided by our virtues (Cooper, 1997; Bobonich, 2010; Brown, 2012). 3 Examples of Eudaimonic WellbeingA couple of millennia later, the teachings of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle continue to shape how we study flourishing and wellbeing. Modern conceptions of Eudaimonic Wellbeing (EWB) are, on the whole, shaped by literature reviews, critical analyses, and empirical examinations of their texts. Coupled with modern research into quality of life and subjective wellbeing (SWB), we have come as far as being able to develop measures for the construct. EWB is defined by Waterman and colleagues (2010: 41) as:
(Sheldon, 2002; Waterman, 1990; 2008)” In their study, they give several examples of EWB (Norton, 1976; Waterman et al., 2010). Here are a few:
These describe some of the EWB concepts on which one well-known measure of EWB is based. Eudaimonic Wellbeing Scale and Questionnaire (PDF)Interested in finding out how you score on a Eudaimonic Wellbeing Scale? The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Wellbeing (QEWB) was developed by the same Waterman as above, and measures one’s (Waterman et al., 2010):
QEWB ItemsSome items from the QEWB include (Waterman et al., 2010):
Interestingly, the findings of this study suggest that EWB may be conceptually distinct from both subjective wellbeing (SWB) and psychological wellbeing (PWB) as a measure of wellbeing. The 21-item scale can be found in its entirety (PDF) in Waterman and colleagues’ original article. 5 Tips on How to Achieve EudaimoniaIf we unpack Deci & Ryan’s earlier definition of eudaimonia, we can discern a few actionable tips. Put them together with Waterman and colleagues’ QEWB scale above, and we have the following. 1. Know your ‘life goals’A terribly lofty goal at first glance, but as we can see from the scale items above, this doesn’t have to mean a ten-, thirty- or fifty-year plan. It doesn’t mean we need to aspire to achieve something or ‘die trying’ either. It is seemingly enough to have, or to strive to have, a sense of the core beliefs which guide you and which give meaning to your existence. How about: “To bring happiness to others” or “To help those who are suffering”? 2. Focus your capabilities and skills towards achieving those goalsAre you a kind person? Great with kids? A talented doctor? Can you direct your skills towards achieving those goals for the sake of practicing virtue? The last is a particularly interesting example, discussed in the YouTube above from Kings College London. It describes how the idea isn’t to become a doctor because that’s going to make you happy, but because you’re aiming to fulfill your own unique best potentials. And of course, to live in accordance with your virtues. 3. Developing your best potentialsAs above, it’s about being the best you can be, driven by authentic and meaningful goals. Stretching that ‘doctor’ example a little further, this would be distinct from wanting to be ‘The Best Doctor You Can Be’ for the pay. 4. Get engaged in these activitiesTo derive meaning from this development is to experience eudaimonia. Why? Because it’s the pursuit itself, and eudaimonia is not an end goal. If this all sounds very confusing, it may help to reflect back on Huta & Waterman’s (2014) definition once more, in which eudaimonia is the “pursuit of virtue, excellence, and the best within us” (Huta & Waterman, 2014: 1426). 5. Express yourselfThis means a little more than it seems at first glance. Waterman and colleagues, in creating the QEWB, describe this as engaging in behavior that expresses ‘who you are’, not just ‘how you feel’. And, they note that people scoring high in EWB tend to engage in these activities much more often than those who don’t. In other words, doing things because you derive genuine enjoyment from them and because they’re consistent with your view of yourself, rather than for external reward. 9 Eudaimonic Activities to Promote Human FlourishingAccording to Schotanus-Dijkstra and colleagues (2016), flourishing describes people who have both high levels of EWB, and hedonic wellbeing. While activities related to both are shown to be important for ‘flourishers’, it’s interesting to note that even having the intention to pursue both may impact on our wellbeing (Huta & Ryan, 2010). That is, out of four groups (hedonic motives only, eudaimonic motives only, both, or no motives at all):
The specific eudaimonic activities they assessed were (Huta & Ryan, 2010):
Daily Activities and BehaviorsIn another ‘daily diary’ study by Steger and colleagues (2008: 29), the following ‘eudaimonic behaviors’ were used to assess wellbeing:
These eudaimonic activities were more strongly correlated than daily hedonic activities with wellbeing in terms of ‘daily meaning in life’ that the participants felt. The same went for daily positive affect and daily life satisfaction (Steger et al., 2008). How Can One Best Practice Virtue?By choosing the ‘golden mean’, to be succinct. Above, I introduced the ideas of excess and scarcity using an example of courage. For Plato, that meant pursuing knowledge as well as the other virtues of temperance, courage, and justice. To practice this pursuit, we need to exercise self-regulation and rational thought (Kraut, 2018). Here is a larger table that goes much further than Plato’s original four virtues (Papouli, 2018). This gives some good examples of how this virtuous mean, between excess and deficiency, can be achieved. Source: Papouli (2018)Eudaimonic vs Hedonic: What’s the Difference?The distinction between eudaimonia and hedonia is examined in great depth by Huta and Waterman in their 2013 review of the happiness literature. For those after a quick, broad distinction between the two, here are the authors’ given examples of eudaimonia, based on literature review:
Contrast and compare these with their examples of hedonia, and you’ll see that very, very roughly, the second is much less value-laden and somewhat more experiential:
Diving a bit deeper into things (quite a bit deeper), they highlight several points that remain unresolved. These include the fact that different definitions tend to be applied depending on whether researchers are examining the concepts at the ‘state’ or ‘trait’ level. Here, too, there are further differences depending on whether a philosophical or psychological standpoint is being adopted. Long story short, there is no one definition for eudaimonia, but according to Huta & Waterman (2013: 1448),
With regard to hedonia, while ‘absence of distress’ wasn’t always an important element,
(Huta & Waterman, 2013: 1448). If you are interested in reading their systematic review, head over to their Research Gate article. The Eudaimonia InstituteThe Eudaimonia Institute is a Salem, North Carolina-based community of scholars. Dedicated to research on eudaimonia, the Institute’s mission is to promote cross-sectoral understandings of the phenomenon. Through greater understanding of the concept itself, and the macro-environmental factors that promote it, the EI takes both an analytical and ‘systems’ view of eudaimonia. But what does that mean in practice? For ResearchersThe EI hosts colloquia, conferences, and hosts lectures, albeit sporadically, according to their website. There is also an opportunity for interested researchers to submit grant applications, and it is possible to apply for a Visiting Research Scholar role. For the PublicFor you, me, and everybody else interested in human flourishing, the Wake Forest University Institute provides conference, research, and employment opportunities. It also has a Research Nexus on the website that offers key examples of interdisciplinary research on the topic. Here, and in the EI News and Events section, expect to find relevant articles that are related to the Institute’s aims. These include:
5 YouTube VideosYou can pick any of these great videos to gain an even greater understanding of eudaimonia. 1. Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38As the title suggests, this is a short, ‘crash-course’ in Aristotlean ethics. Seven minutes, to be precise, and yet somehow quite a thorough overview of what eudaimonia is and is not. 2. A Recipe for Eudaimonia | Jay Kannaiyan | TEDxGurugramCleantech entrepreneur Jay Kannaiyan discusses his own interpretation of eudaimonia and his pursuit of the same. His own personal experience involved leaving a corporate job to embark on his own motorcycle journey in search of eudaimonia. 3. What is success? The Eudaimonia perspective | Christina Garidi | TEDxDrapanosWomenChristina Garidi is the Founder of Eudaimonia Coaching UK, a coaching approach for professionals, businesses, and individuals. This TEDx Talk is more about her personal experience with eudaimonia. She talks about finding her purpose, redefining her understanding of success, and aligning the two. 4. PNTV: The Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle“The word [Eudaimonia], which we commonly translate to mean happiness, actually means much more”. Opening with this as an introduction, the video looks at five concepts – eudaimonia, arête, the Olympics, the mean, and magnanimity. A good combination of doctrines and examples to provide more context to the eudaimonia concept. 5. King’s College London: History of Philosophy’s Greatest Hits: AristotleIn case you missed this video earlier, Professor Peter Adamson gives great examples of how Aristotle’s ‘golden mean’ concept both works and doesn’t always work. He suggests that rather than attempting to tell us how to live a life of virtue, Aristotle simply describes what this looks like. Clear, easy to follow, and potentially an “Aha” moment kind of video that really explains these ideas—and the philosopher’s approach, in brief. 3 Recommended BooksIf reading appeals to you more, here are three books on the topic. 1. The Handbook of Eudaimonic Well Being (International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life) – Joar VittersoThe Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being is edited by Dr. Joar Vittersø, a psychology professor with a social psychology Ph.D. from Oslo University. This compiles theory and empirical findings from researchers and academics from both historical and philosophical perspectives. It provides different insights as well as considering the criticisms of wellbeing and eudaimonia. Find the book on Amazon. 2. Happiness for Humans: Daniel C. RussellUniversity of Arizona Professor Daniel Russell presents an in-depth look at how classic Stoic and Aristotlean eudaimonism, have implications in the modern world. Professor Russell’s main premise is that happiness is about having a life of activity. He considers what this could mean for contemporary politics and business, amongst other things. Find the book on Amazon. 3. Aristotle’s Way: How Ancient Wisdom Can Change Your Life – Edith HallEdith Hall argues along similar lines to Professor Adamson, who we mentioned earlier. That is, rather than layout rules for how to be happy, Aristotle was a thinker who described. And he led by example. Aristotle’s Way considers how we can ‘engage with the texture of existence’, and live in accordance with virtues. The book itself is laid out across ten practical lessons that, essentially, discuss what it means to be happy and human in our modern world. Find the book on Amazon. 7 Quotes on the Topic
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics
Socrates
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics
Vanna Bonta
Maya Angelou
Phillipa Gregory
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics A Take-Home MessageHave you heard of eudaimonia before this article? If you did, we would love to hear about your experience, in particular, whether you first came across the topic from a philosophical or psychological angle. What do you think of its potential applications for wellbeing, and of the QEWB scale? Or, perhaps on a more practical note, have you got something to share about how policies might promote eudaimonia? Let us know in the comments! We hope you enjoyed reading this article. Don’t forget to download our three Positive Psychology Exercises for free.
|